Transparency likely in health reform, RxP tells Financial Times
One major source of legislative pressure is the Physician Payment Sunshine provision, which has appeared in both House and Senate health reform bills. The Sunshine provisions, modeled on the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, would require drug and medical device companies to disclose payments to physicians, hospitals, and medical schools on a single, publicly-searchable online database.
Despite uncertainty about other components of health reform, Pew Prescription Project Director Allan Coukell told the Times we can be “pretty confident drug and medical device companies will be required to make public payments to doctors.”
The transparency provisions have gained wide support over the past several years as undisclosed millions given by drug companies to academic researchers and clinicians have come to light through court cases and Congressional investigations.
“The scale of funding and legal actions has made the issue particularly prominent in the US, although similar concerns have been expressed in many other countries including the UK, with the Royal College of Physicians this year calling for a ban on drug company gifts to doctors and support for medical training,” writes the Times.
Since the Sunshine Act was introduced two years ago, a handful of large drug and device companies have announced voluntary disclosure measures similar to Merck’s, including Medtronic, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and GlaxoSmithKline. (Some have been obligated to do so under corporate integrity agreements entered into in court settlements.)
For more, visit the RxP Sunshine Act Guide.





September 28th, 2009 at 11:59 am
i think you take this subject out of context where at times doctors present talks on pharmaceutical products, but it should be public info.
What should be public info but is not, is the contributions that politicians get to speak, or appear. Include the jobs and perks that their family members receive for votes and for influence that effects this whole country.