<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All the news that’s fit to print—or e-mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://postscript.communitycatalyst.org/?feed=rss2&#038;p=29" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://postscript.communitycatalyst.org/?p=29</link>
	<description>A Blog by Community Catalyst</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 16:23:42 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://postscript.communitycatalyst.org/?p=29&#038;cpage=1#comment-777</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 04:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prescriptionproject.org/blog/?p=29#comment-777</guid>
		<description>Are Drug Reps Really Necessary?

One of the main functions of pharmaceutical representatives is to provide free samples to doctor’s offices, and these samples in themselves cost billions to the industry.  Yet arguably, samples are the most influential tool in influencing the prescribing habit of a health care provider.  Let me be clear on that point:  Its samples, not a representative.
Yet considering that drug promotion overall is approaching 20 billion a year, combined with about 5 billion spent on drug reps themselves, what if there is another way for doctors to get free drug samples, which is what they desire for their patients to initiate various treatment regimens?
There is, actually.  With some select, smaller pharma companies, doctors have the ability to order samples through printing order forms on line for certain medications through certain web sites associated with the manufacturers of these samples.  Some examples are such medications that can be ordered in such a way are keflex, extendryl, and allerx.  Possibly several more can or are available to prescribers in this way.  Others, however, cannot be acquired by this method.    
A doctor can go on line, print off a sample order form, fax it into a designated fax number after completion of the form, and the samples are shipped directly to the doctor’s office with some products thanks to their manufacturers who provide this avenue. 
 Usually, this system is available for those smaller companies with very small sales forces to compensate for vacant territories, but can be applied to any pharmaceutical company who, upon discretion, could implement such a system.
Now, why is this not done more often?  Apparently, it is legal to obtain samples in this manner.  If samples are the number one influencer of prescribing habits, why spend all the money on reps to deliver samples personally?  It’s worth exploring, possibly.
Think of the money that could be saved if more pharma companies offered samples to doctors in this manner.  Furthermore, additional benefits with this system is that there is no interruption of the doctor’s practice.  Also, there is no risk of bias presented to the doctor by a rep, as they would avoid contact with reps if they order samples through this way- to have the samples directly to be shipped to their office.
When samples are shipped to doctors’ offices in this manner, prescribing information is included with the samples shipped.  Doctors can order and utilize samples according to their discretion, and would be free of interference from the marketing elements of pharmaceutical corporations.
Considering the high costs associated with the pharmaceutical industry, having samples shipped directly to doctor’s offices should be utilized more than it is presently- regardless of the size of the pharmaceutical company.  
Something to think about as one ponders cost savings regarding this issue.
	
“The new source of power is not money in the hands of a few but information in the hands of many.”
---- John Naisbitt

Dan Abshear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are Drug Reps Really Necessary?</p>
<p>One of the main functions of pharmaceutical representatives is to provide free samples to doctor’s offices, and these samples in themselves cost billions to the industry.  Yet arguably, samples are the most influential tool in influencing the prescribing habit of a health care provider.  Let me be clear on that point:  Its samples, not a representative.<br />
Yet considering that drug promotion overall is approaching 20 billion a year, combined with about 5 billion spent on drug reps themselves, what if there is another way for doctors to get free drug samples, which is what they desire for their patients to initiate various treatment regimens?<br />
There is, actually.  With some select, smaller pharma companies, doctors have the ability to order samples through printing order forms on line for certain medications through certain web sites associated with the manufacturers of these samples.  Some examples are such medications that can be ordered in such a way are keflex, extendryl, and allerx.  Possibly several more can or are available to prescribers in this way.  Others, however, cannot be acquired by this method.<br />
A doctor can go on line, print off a sample order form, fax it into a designated fax number after completion of the form, and the samples are shipped directly to the doctor’s office with some products thanks to their manufacturers who provide this avenue.<br />
 Usually, this system is available for those smaller companies with very small sales forces to compensate for vacant territories, but can be applied to any pharmaceutical company who, upon discretion, could implement such a system.<br />
Now, why is this not done more often?  Apparently, it is legal to obtain samples in this manner.  If samples are the number one influencer of prescribing habits, why spend all the money on reps to deliver samples personally?  It’s worth exploring, possibly.<br />
Think of the money that could be saved if more pharma companies offered samples to doctors in this manner.  Furthermore, additional benefits with this system is that there is no interruption of the doctor’s practice.  Also, there is no risk of bias presented to the doctor by a rep, as they would avoid contact with reps if they order samples through this way- to have the samples directly to be shipped to their office.<br />
When samples are shipped to doctors’ offices in this manner, prescribing information is included with the samples shipped.  Doctors can order and utilize samples according to their discretion, and would be free of interference from the marketing elements of pharmaceutical corporations.<br />
Considering the high costs associated with the pharmaceutical industry, having samples shipped directly to doctor’s offices should be utilized more than it is presently- regardless of the size of the pharmaceutical company.<br />
Something to think about as one ponders cost savings regarding this issue.</p>
<p>“The new source of power is not money in the hands of a few but information in the hands of many.”<br />
&#8212;- John Naisbitt</p>
<p>Dan Abshear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
